|
Cultures
of NACA Members
Alaska Natives
When Alaska became part of the United States
in 1867, there was no provision for private ownership in the new
territory, except for the private individual property holders who
had obtained written title to the land under the Russians. The U.S.
Organic Act of 1884 allowed non-Alaska Natives to own mining sites,
as long as they were not in areas of use or occupation by indigenous
Alaskan’s. Subsequent law enacted in the 1900’s allowed
for Alaska Natives to obtain restricted title to some ancestral
lands. One example of the restrictions placed on the title was that
Alaska Native owners did not have the right to sell the land without
permission of the Federal Government. Various other laws allowed
new settlers to homestead large areas of land, provided they surveyed
and worked it.
By the time of statehood in 1959, most of the land in Alaska was
claimed by the Federal Government, with a small amount -- centered
around the cities -- owned by individuals, almost all of whom were
new settlers. Yet, the rights of Alaska Natives to their ancestral
lands had been acknowledged in a number of legal documents from
the time of Alaska’s purchase. The message in all the documents
was that Alaska Natives owned their own land, but that it is up
to future generations to decide how they would get title to it.
Exactly which lands were the ancestral lands had not been addressed
until the 1900s, when bit by bit, Natives began to lay claim to
portions of the land in the territory. Because of a growing non-Native
population in Alaska, the discovery of a vast oil field on the North
Slope of Alaska, and increasing demands for that oil in the lower
48, the question of “who owns Alaska” became a national
issue in the 1960’s.
The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971
The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) [ANCSA Background
document] of 1971 settled the land claims of Alaska Native people
in exchange for approximately 44 million acres of land plus $962.5
million to start ANCSA corporations. To participate under the claims
act you had to be of at least one-fourth Native ancestry. Of the
approximately 80,000 Natives enrolled under ANCSA, those living
in villages (approximately two-thirds of the total) would receive
100 shares in both a village and a regional corporation. The remaining
one-third would be “at-large” shareholders with 100
shares in a regional corporation plus additional rights to regional
mineral and timber resources. Twelve regional corporations set up
within the state would administer the settlement. A thirteenth corporation
composed of Alaska Natives who had left the state would receive
money, but not land. The settlement act created corporations as
an alternative to the reservation system set up for Native Americans
in the lower 48 states.
Native Hawaiians
In 1810 the kingdom of Hawaii was established creating a unified, independent
constitutional monarchy, ending the reign of chiefdoms. The traditional Native
Hawaiian political system, individual chiefdoms, involved a highly complex social
structure and feudal system. In 1840, the Kingdom of Hawaii adopted its first
of four constitutions. The constitution of 1840 instituted a House of Representatives,
House of Nobles and a Judiciary system.
Hawaii was recognized by the United States as a strategic location for trade,
military protection and economic development. In 1893, with assistance from American
troops from the U.S.S. Boston, American businessmen illegally overthrew the Kingdom.
Queen Lili’uokalani was removed from power and the Republic of Hawaii was
declared. In 1897, Hawaii was annexed to the U.S., creating the territory of
Hawaii on July 7, 1898. The Admission Act of 1959 created the State of Hawaii,
ceding all of the lands from the Kingdom to the U.S. and stated that the U.S.
would in return create a trust to better the conditions of Native Hawaiians.
In 1960, the State of Hawaii created the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands to
manage 200,000 acres of trust lands established in 1920 by the federal government.
In 1974, the Native American Programs Act was amended to include Native Hawaiians
as a category of indigenous people of the U.S. This allowed Native Hawaiians
to become eligible for some of the federal assistance programs designed for Native
American tribes. Over the course of the last 30 years, more than 160 pieces of
federal legislation have been implemented on a variety of issues, including affordable
housing, healthcare and education, which reaffirm the indigenous status of Native
Hawaiians. During the 1978 State Constitutional Convention, in an effort to study
and preserve Hawaiian culture, history and language, the Hawaiian State Government
established the Office of Hawaiian Affairs.
In 1993, former President Clinton signed an Apology Resolution for the illegal
overthrow of the Kingdom of Hawaii and use of the American troops against Queen
Lili’uokalani. In 1996, Native Hawaiians voted to create an interim Native
Hawaiian government to reestablish self determination. In the early 2000s, Senator
Daniel Akaka and Senator Daniel Inouye introduced the Native Hawaiian Government
Reorganization Act which is currently pending before the Congress. If passed,
this legislation would establish a process for the reorganization of a Native
Hawaiian government similar to that of Native American tribes. Native Hawaiians
still await the passage of this bill as well as the return of their lands from
both the federal and state governments.
Native American Tribal Groups
Prior to European contact there were approximately seven to ten million Native
Americans residing in the borders of the present day United States. Today, there
are 567 recognized Indian tribes with a total membership of approximately 1.7
million in the U.S. The U.S. government, recognizing the independence of these
tribes, created a means of interacting with them. The U.S. Constitution (1787)
recognized a special relationship between tribes and the Federal Government,
and has been reinforced and strengthened through treaties, laws, Supreme Court
decisions, and Executive Orders.
Between 1778 and 1868, there were 367 treaties ratified between the U.S. government
and various Native American tribes. These treaties acknowledged the sovereignty
of tribes as independent political communities to be self-governed. At the same
time, they acknowledged tribes as domestic dependent nations of the U.S., reliant
on the U.S. for protection and economic development.
The U.S. government’s policy toward Native Americans has varied over time
and has brought with it drastic changes to tribes’ way of life and economic
self-sufficiency. In 1824, the U.S. Indian Office was established and changed
federal Indian policy from one of friendly co-existence with Natives to physical
removal and assimilation. Later, the 1830 Indian Removal Act forced the eviction
of Native Americans from east of the Mississippi River. After the Civil War,
tribes were relocated to reservations where they remained until the General Allotment
(Dawes) Act of 1887. The General Allotment Act was an attempt to end tribes’ collective
ownership of land. Tribal members were given smaller, individually owned lots.
The remaining 90,000 “surplus” acres of land were purchased by new
western settlers. In response to the devastating effects of the Allotment Act,
in 1934 the Indian Reorganization Act ended the allotment process and restored
some of the reservations.
In the 1950s, the Federal Government again changed its Native American policy.
Coined the termination policy, tribal lands were dissolved as Native Americans
were relocated from their reservations to urban centers. The 1970s brought an
end to the termination policy.
The 1980s and 1990s led to a resurgence of Indian self-determination and pride.
Today, the Federal Government is continuing to work and support its constitutional
and treaty obligations to provide protection and to promote economic development,
through programs like the Small Business Administration’s 8(a) program.
Native American 8(a) Contracting
Economic self-sufficiency is an important goal
for the ANCSA and Tribal corporations. One of the more successful
initiatives in helping Native Americans achieve this goal was to
qualify ANCSA and Tribal corporations for the Small Business Administration’s
8(a) program by including them in the definition of “socially
and economically disadvantaged” individuals. Under this program,
Native Americans qualify to receive government contracts on a sole-source
basis. Unlike other individuals or firms that qualify under the
8(a) program, ANCSA corporations and Tribal organizations and Native
Hawaiian Organizations are able to receive a sole-source government
contract regardless of the amount.
The 8(a) provisions have opened the doors for the shareholders of
ANCSA corporations who receive numerous benefits from financially
successful government contracts. These benefits are distributed
among all of the shareholders through dividends, job opportunities,
education and training, scholarships and cultural programs. ANCSA
corporation shares cannot be sold, traded or levied, making the
ANCSA corporations success an important factor in the lives of shareholders.
ANSCA corporations are for-profit businesses, but they also have
social and cultural responsibilities, including the management of
large land holdings and supporting of their peoples’ cultural
traditions and subsistence way of life.
Native American contractors provide services to the Federal Government
in every conceivable capacity, throughout the world. They supply
logistic support to navy ships, electronic security services to
the Department of Defense, construction services, oil field services,
and Information Technology, just to name a few. The Federal Government
and contractors within the Native American community are forging
a new relationship to the betterment of both. The Government is
able to expeditiously obtain services, meet its small business contracting
goals, and receive exceptional contract performance from a progressive
contractor pool. Native American contractors benefit through the
broadening of their economic base which directly enhances the lives
of individuals within Native American communities.
|
|